#Xrecode ii alternative how to#
#Xrecode ii alternative software#
#Xrecode ii alternative free#

GoldWave can and will use separate processors for playback, recording, rendering visuals, and redrawing waveforms.

Significant improvements have been made in recent versions to use dual cores and accelerated processing for some of the effects as well (such as Noise Reduction, Spectrum Filter, Time Warp, etc.) increasing performance by an order of magnitude in some cases. GoldWave v5 has always been a multithreaded program capable of using multiple processors. GoldWave has been developed on dual processor systems for nearly 10 years. So even if GW didn't have multicore support (which is an academic point because it does) I would vote in favour of a more stable program any day of the week. And then you need to deal with all the subtle (and not-so-subtle) bugs that arise out of such a radical overhaul of your program. It's not just a matter of ticking a box that says 'can I have 5 pints of multicore support and a packet of peanuts please', you need to examine the entire architecture of your program, synchronise threads, ensure that all routines are thread safe, create mutexes on critical areas of memory (such as the file you're opening or editing), etc etc etc, as well as ensure that the processor overhead from all this baggage doesn't outweigh any gains you get. Thirdly, programming multicore support is hard. Don't believe me? Run an intensive noise reduction/spectrum filter/EQ or whatever and watch all cores peak at 100%.

Secondly, GW actually does have multicore support in the program itself.

#Xrecode ii alternative how to#

Like any child worth his salt, if I could have figured out how to fit more than 3 chocolate chip cookies into my mouth at a time, I would have.įirstly, as has been said, it's down to the codecs being used, and whether or not they have multicore support. The end result is a type of multi-core support (without the headache of sorting out concurrencies in your own code) which scales (mostly memory-wise) automatically to whatever hardware the user happens to have.Īgain, I'm mindful that GoldWave is designed for editing and this doesn't much play a part in that, but for some operations it could prove handy (such as CUE splitting or even when opening 10 or 12 files at a time into the editor itself). for customers who have spurious amounts of memory - instead of actually producing a custom 圆4 version of the application itself, they just spawn multiple processes of an x86 application and let the OS itself sort out the core affinities (Win7 does this better than Vista, and even Snoopy could do it better than XP) and memory handling. This idea is similar to how Adobe recently cheated on their 圆4 support in video transcoding in Premier.

CUE entries would be a more practical approach than the current linear one. I have often thought that spawning multiple instances of lame (or whatever - the actual codec need not be multi-core supportive) when exporting large numbers of. While the OP was a little tactless by insisting upon a feature that (as pointed out above) is not used often in the milieu of editing, he raises a valid point. With GoldWave I can get help directly from the program developer! (This is mostly a user-to-user forum, but direct support is also available.)

#Xrecode ii alternative software#

I wish my video editing program was as trouble-free as GoldWave!Īnd, GoldWave has top-notch technical support! Most software companies provide terrible tech support, from low-skilled staff reading from a 'script'. (GoldWave is my main audio editor, but I use other tools when I need to do something that GoldWave can't do.)Īs a long-time GoldWave user, I can say that Chris is an excellent programmer! Goldwave is a basic entry-level/hobbyist program, but it's easy to use and rock-solid! When users have trouble, it's almost always a 3rd-party CODEC and not GoldWave itself.

If GoldWave doesn't meet your needs, there are plenty of alternatives. If your main use is batch converting, perhaps GoldWave isn't the best choice for you. And since editing takes human interaction and careful listening, you can't really edit more than one 'program' at a time. Typically, users like me are spending lots of time editing and it's no big deal if it takes a couple of minutes to open or save a file.

#Xrecode ii alternative free#

(If you search, you can find the older FREE version of XRECODE.) Here are multicore MP3 & FLAC encoders, but they probably don't work with GoldWave.įor conversion, XRECODE II ($15) also supports multicore conversion when converting multiple files. Chris (GoldWave's developer) didn't write LAME, and doubt he wrote his own FLAC CODEC either!